Google published a blog stating that it blocks cookies, so they do not violate privacy. Two Stanford University researchers deny Google’s perspective and accuse Google of gaslighting privacy.
Ph.D. Researchers Accuse Google of Being Disingenuous
Two researchers, Jonathan Meyer and Arvind Narayanan have publicly denied (not quite) Google’s claims of invasion of privacy.
Firefox recently accused Google and Chrome of being dishonest in their privacy by saying that Chrome’s privacy model “does not stop third-party monitoring.”
The great digital marketing company is A One Sol to contact today.
The researchers presented the following four arguments to Google Chrome:
‘1)Blocking cookies does not affect the privacy of the Internet. Unlike Google, privacy matters.
2) There is little reliable evidence of ad benchmarking.
3)Google must develop an innovative strategy to balance privacy and advertising. He insisted on the first methods he had previously claimed to be unrealistic.
4)Google tries to focus on the network standardization process, which results in a delay of several years. “
Is Google Gaslighting About Privacy?
Gasillumination is a psychological virus in which a person leads to suspicious, accurate facts and observations.
Teachers strongly opposed Google’s statement. They claim that Google manipulates the facts to prevent cookies from gaining access to sensitive information.
Contact us for website copywriting services.
For example, the researchers mentioned Google’s statement:
“Using publishers and advertisers to bring advertising closer to using technology is now beyond its original purpose because some computing methods do not meet users’ privacy expectations.”
The researchers then ruled out the following:
“If the character refers to the original model, the removal of cookies should not allow third-party tracking, and it is believed that the browser would block them. We know this because the originator of the original technical specification of the cookie has already stated this (RFC 2109), paragraph 4.3.5.).
Likewise, if the confidentiality certificate is a link, be clear: studies have repeatedly shown that users do not understand and do not want advanced network monitoring. “
As you can see, the researchers support their rejection by referencing research and approved documents to prove their claims have a sufficient basis.
Read also: Twitter Shows Tweets with Video Attract 10x More Engagement.
The SEO Community is Aware of Privacy Issues
Bill Slaw ski accepted the rejection on Twitter. He stated that the petition was well supported.
Stanford University Tweets Support for Researchers
Stanford Center for Internet & Society tweeted this article on Twitter, explaining everything.
This is About More than Privacy
This issue is beyond confidentiality. At the heart of privacy, the debate is how free Internet companies pay back their investment.
The Internet is based on selling e-commerce and graphic advertising. However, this model has become a complex tracking model that allows sellers to focus on certain types of consumers, leading to higher advertising prices.
Therefore, we must use the information and services and store the information and services for free. The challenge is to find a solution that protects consumers’ privacy.